Schmitt G, Ridings J, De Schaepdrijver L, van Doesum-Wolters C, Cappon GD, Hartmann A. 2016. Nonclinical safety considerations for the development of pediatric-first drugs: An industry view. Therapeut Innov Regul Sci 50(5):632–638, DOI:10.1177/2168479016642813, online article.
Abstract
This paper provides considerations on approaches to the development of medicines initially developed for pediatric use (ie, “pediatric-first” or “pediatric-only” drugs). The most common development approach for these types of medicines involves a first-in-human (FIH) clinical trial with healthy adult volunteers to assess safety and tolerability. This approach generally requires nonclinical repeat-dose studies in adult animals; safety pharmacology and in vivo genetic toxicology studies in adult animals are also performed for small-molecule drugs. Additional studies in juvenile animals may be required prior to clinical trials in pediatric patients, on a case-by-case basis. In this paradigm, the starting dose for pediatric patients is primarily driven by modeling from the adult pharmacokinetic assessment and pharmacology data. A second development approach is where the FIH clinical trial is conducted in pediatric patients. This approach is generally supported by repeat-dose studies in juvenile animals, with the onset of dosing at ages that developmentally correlate to the age of the pediatric patients. Safety pharmacology and in vivo genetic toxicology studies are generally performed in adult animals for small-molecule drugs. To define a safe yet minimally efficacious starting dose for pediatric patients, various complementing approaches can be used, including human equivalent dose, minimal anticipated biological effect level, and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling. Case examples for pediatric-first drug candidates show how both drug development approaches (ie, entry into human first in adults or directly in pediatric populations) are used in the pharmaceutical industry.