Accurate in vitro models of intestinal permeability are essential for predicting oral drug absorption. Standard models like Caco-2 cells have well-known limitations, including lack of segment-specific physiology, but are widely used. Emerging models such as organoid-derived monolayers and microphysiological systems (MPS) offer enhanced physiological relevance but require comparative validation. We performed a head-to-head evaluation of Caco-2 cells, human jejunal (J2) and duodenal (D109) enteroid-derived cells, and EpiIntestinal^TM tissues cultured on either static Transwell and flow-based MPS platforms. We assessed tissue morphology, barrier function (TEER, dextran leakage), and permeability of three model small molecules (caffeine, propranolol, and indomethacin), integrating the data into a physiologically based gut absorption model (PECAT) to predict human oral bioavailability. J2 and D109 cells demonstrated more physiologically relevant morphology and higher TEER than Caco-2 cells, while the EpiIntestinal^TM model exhibited thicker and more uneven tissue structures with lower TEER and higher passive permeability. MPS cultures offered modest improvements in epithelial architecture but introduced greater variability, especially with enteroid-derived cells. Predictions of human fraction absorbed (F_abs) were most accurate when using static Caco-2 data with segment-specific corrections based on enteroid-derived values, highlighting the utility of combining traditional and advanced in vitro gut models to optimize predictive performance for F_abs. While MPS and enteroid-based systems provide physiological advantages, standard static models remain robust and predictive when used with in silico modeling. Our findings support the need for further refinement of enteroid-MPS integration and advocate for standardized benchmarking across gut model systems to improve translational relevance in drug development and regulatory reviews